Method Article

A Mouse Model of Single and Repetitive Rotational Closed Head Concussive Brain Injury

DOI:

10.3791/70994

July 17th, 2026

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

A reproducible mouse model of rotational concussive brain injury is described, providing a versatile method to investigate the subtle functional and biological underpinnings - including neurovascular, inflammatory, and behavioral changes - following single or repetitive impact in the absence of overt structural brain damage.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Concussive brain injury (CBI), the pathophysiological substrate underlying clinical concussion, is a frequent yet insufficiently understood condition with potential long-term neurological impairment in a subset of patients. Especially repetitive CBI, i.e., in contact sports, has been associated with lasting cognitive deficits and progressive neurodegeneration (e.g., chronic traumatic encephalopathy, CTE). To address this knowledge gap, a reproducible mouse model of closed-head rotational brain injury that recapitulates key biomechanical and pathological features of CBI was established. A stereotactically guided electromagnetic impactor was used to deliver a standardized strike to the intact skull. To reduce focal strain on the skull and adjacent brain tissue, the impactor tip was fitted with a custom-made silicone cap. This configuration reliably induced head rotation with low inter-animal variability while preventing skull fractures or microscopic tissue injury. To preserve physiological neuronal and vascular activity and to avoid potentially neuromodulatory effects of deep anesthesia, brain injury was induced in conscious mice under light sedation using the α2-agonist medetomidine. The induced impacts caused reproducible rotational head motion with only minor variability attributable to head positioning. Structural brain integrity was assessed using in vivo T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and confirmed by ex vivo histological analyses, which revealed no evidence of tissue disruption, contusion, or microbleeds but demonstrated a mild, widespread disruption of the microvascular interface. This novel model of rotational closed-head brain injury provides a robust experimental platform for longitudinal investigations of subtle neurovascular, inflammatory, and blood-brain barrier alterations that occur in the absence of overt structural pathology. Its application enables mechanistic insights into the pathophysiology of clinical concussion and potential neurodegenerative consequences of repetitive injury, thereby facilitating the development of urgently needed clinical biomarkers.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a significant cause of long-term disability across all age groups, with adolescents and young adults disproportionately affected1,2,3. The vast majority of TBIs are classified as mild (mTBI), commonly referred to as a concussion at the clinical level. Although concussion is by definition not associated with overt structural brain damage detectable by conventional neuroimaging, increasing evidence suggests that the underlying injury mechanism—here referred to as concussive brain injury (CBI)—represents a distinct and clinically relevant pathophysiological entity.

In particular, repetitive CBI, especially when occurring in close temporal succession, as frequently encountered in contact sports and military settings, has been linked to persistent cognitive decline, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and the development of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE)1,2,3. This apparent discrepancy between the mild nature of the initial injury and the potential for long-term neurological sequelae poses a major challenge for both clinical diagnosis and mechanistic research.

Emerging evidence indicates that subtle yet sustained alterations at the neurovascular and neuroglial interface pose a relevant disease mechanism4. These changes encompass blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity, microvascular structure, glial activation, neuronal excitability, and endogenous repair processes, potentially linking cellular-level pathophysiology to the long-term functional and behavioral deficits observed after, especially repetitive, CBI5,6,7,8. Collectively, such alterations are increasingly recognized as potential contributors to the delayed functional and behavioral deficits following CBI. However, the diffuse and multifaceted nature complicates a mechanistic understanding and has so far impeded the development of targeted therapeutic interventions.

Preclinical models that recapitulate key aspects of the pathophysiological cascade are crucial tools for dissecting these mechanisms and identifying new therapeutic avenues. While a wide range of experimental TBI models exists, most were designed to mimic moderate to severe injuries or rely on focal structural damage9,10,11. In contrast, there is an astonishing lack of animal models for the characteristic injury mechanism of CBI5. Mostly, a cerebral trauma labeled as “mild” is being induced by a focal impact to the rigidly fixated head, or even by direct cortical impact following craniotomy, which fundamentally contradicts the diffuse, acceleration-deceleration-driven injury mechanism that defines concussion in humans6,7. Although such approaches allow precise control over injury parameters, their limited ability to replicate the dynamics of real-world concussions reduces their translational relevance.

To overcome these limitations, several methods exist to induce a replicable and diffuse closed-brain injury12,13,14. Building on these concepts and aiming to minimize technical complexity, a controlled rotational injury model in mice using a commercially available electromagnetic impactor often employed in other experimental trauma models (i.e., controlled cortical impact, CCI) was developed. By delivering a reproducible impact to the freely moving head, this approach preserves structural integrity while enabling the longitudinal investigation of neurovascular, neuroglial, and functional alterations following single and repetitive CBI under conditions that closely approximate the biomechanical features of human concussion.

Combined with longitudinal behavioral assessment, in vivo imaging, and ex vivo histology, this model provides a versatile and accessible platform to explore neurovascular, glial, and behavioral alterations following single or repetitive impacts. As such, it is well-suited for studying the subtle secondary disease mechanisms of CBI, identifying translational surrogate parameters, and evaluating potential therapeutic interventions in a clinically relevant experimental setting.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

All animal procedures complied with the German Animal Welfare Act and were approved by institutional and governmental authorities (LANUV Nordrhein-Westfalen; AZ 81-02.04.2020.A058). Experiments were conducted following ARRIVE guidelines. A schematic workflow is detailed in Figure 1. This protocol reliably induces concussive brain injury, as evidenced by a defined panel of structural, behavioral, and neurovascular validation outcomes (Figure 2). All materials used in this study are detailed in the Table of Materials.

1. General considerations

NOTE: Mice were socially housed under standardized conditions (12 h light/dark cycle) with ad libitum access to food and water. Mice were acclimated to the experimental facility for at least 7 days before surgery. A total of 40 mice were used in this pilot study, with 10 animals allocated to each experimental group (sham as a control group, single CBI group, repetitive CBI in high-frequency, and repetitive CBI in low-frequency group). Set up a high-speed camera system at eye level with the mouse head in a fixed position in front of the mouse (e.g., 10 cm). To ensure consistency across trials, keep the camera position and orientation constant. A GoPro Hero6 was used in this study at 240 frames per second (fps) with a resolution of 1080px. The open-source motion analysis software Kinovea (version 2025.2.0) is used for the kinematic analyses described.

2. Analgesia and anesthesia induction

  1. Prepare the setup, including the stereotactic frame and attachment for the electromagnetic impactor.
  2. Administer Tramadol (1 mg/mL) via drinking water two days before trauma induction and continue for three days after the (last) surgery.
  3. Induce anesthesia using isoflurane in a nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture (O2 30%, N2O 70%), with 4–4.5% isoflurane in an induction chamber.
  4. Assess surgical tolerance using the toe-pinch reflex. Proceed once a withdrawal response is absent.
  5. Remove the mouse from the induction chamber and place it on a heating pad within the stereotactic frame. Maintain the core temperature at 37 ± 1.0 °C using a fiber-optic rectal probe. Protect the eyes from desiccation by applying ophthalmic ointment.
  6. Maintain anesthesia by delivering isoflurane at 2,0–2,5% via a nose cone connected to the stereotactic setup.

3. Preparation of the skull

  1. Fix the mouse within the stereotactic frame using specific ear bars.
  2. Shave the scalp and thoroughly disinfect the surgical area with an alcohol-based antiseptic.
  3. Apply local anesthesia by subcutaneous injection of Bupivacaine (0.1 mg/kg).
  4. Reassess the toe-pinch reflex before skin incision. Proceed only in the absence of a withdrawal response to ensure a consistent depth of anesthesia.
  5. Perform a midline skin incision of approximately 7 mm to expose the skull.
  6. Carefully expose the skull over the right parietal bone between Bregma and Lambda.
  7. Ensure that the stereotactic frame is oriented perpendicular to the skull, with the vertical axis positioned at a 90° angle relative to the head surface.
  8. Mount a marker pin into the stereotactic holder and center it directly on Bregma.
  9. Zero all stereotactic coordinates and move the marker pin to the predefined anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) coordinate (in our model, at AP 0.5, ML -2.5). Mark the target point with a water-resistant felt-tip pen.

4. Adjustment of analgesia

  1. Release the mouse from the ear bars.
  2. Inject medetomidine subcutaneously (0.5 mg/kg) and gradually reduce isoflurane to <0.5 %.
  3. Maintain anesthesia at < 0.5% isoflurane while continuously monitoring respiration and body temperature.
  4. Allow for equilibration under these conditions for 10 min to reach a steady state of anesthesia while preserving neuronal network activity. Respiratory rate, absence of reflex responses, and stable body temperature (37 ± 1.0 °C) were used as standardized indicators to ensure comparable anesthesia depth across animals.

5. Impact induction

NOTE: Before the experiment, fabricate a head holder for the animal model from commercially available polyethylene (PE) foam pipe insulation, a closed-cell, non-crosslinked polymer foam, that restricts downward acceleration while allowing rotational movement. Additionally, fabricate a custom-made 5 mm spherical impactor tip made from silpuran (ratio 1:1; stiffness 830 kPa).

  1. Remove the rectal temperature probe and discontinue isoflurane delivery, then place the mouse in a prone position on the head holder.
  2. Attach the custom-made silicone cap to the commercially available impactor tip.
  3. Mount the electromagnetic impactor into the stereotactic holder and ensure that the device is oriented at a 10° angle relative to the skull surface.
  4. Align the impactor tip above the predefined target region on the skull.
  5. Lower the impactor tip in the protracted position until it lightly contacts the skull surface.
  6. Retract the impactor tip and advance it to the desired indentation depth (i.e., 3 mm in these experiments) toward the skull surface. For control animals, omit the lowering and raise the tip by the same amount instead.
  7. Start video recording. Deliver a single rotational concussive impact by triggering the electromagnetic bolt via the control switch with a velocity of 5 mm/s and a pulse duration of 0.1 ms.
  8. Retract the impactor immediately after completion of the impact.
  9. Antagonize medetomidine anesthesia using the antagonist atipamazole (0.5 mg/kg, s.c.).

6. Post-impact assessment and wound closure

  1. Turn the mouse into a supine position.
  2. Assess the righting reflex by recording the time required for the animal to return to a prone position.
  3. Re-induce anesthesia with isoflurane in a nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture (O2 30%, N2O 70%) at 4% isoflurane.
  4. Remove the mouse from the induction chamber and place it on the heating pad by the stereotactical frame. Maintain the core temperature at 37 ± 1.0 °C using a fiber-optic rectal probe.
  5. Fix the mouse in the stereotactic frame using ear bars.
  6. Close the skin incision using interrupted sutures with self-absorbing filaments (e.g., Polyglactin 910, 6-0).
  7. Transfer the mouse to a warming box and monitor until full recovery of consciousness.
  8. Return the animal to its home cage.

7. Repeated impact paradigm

  1. Assign mice to sham, single, or repeated CBI groups according to the experimental design.
  2. For repeated-injury groups, schedule subsequent CBI sessions at defined intervals (e.g., every 48 h).
  3. Before each subsequent CBI, administer preoperative analgesia via tramadol in drinking water as described in section 3.1.
  4. Repeat anesthesia, stereotactic marking, and impact following the same procedure outlined in sections 3–6, including local anesthesia with bupivacaine (0.1 mg/kg, s.c.), medetomidine administration (0.5 mg/kg, s.c.) with maintenance of isoflurane at < 0.5%, stereotactic targeting at AP 0.5 and ML −2.5 relative to Bregma, and delivery of a rotational concussive impact using an electromagnetic impactor (indentation depth 3 mm, velocity 5 mm/s, pulse duration 0.1 ms, 10° angle relative to the skull surface).
  5. Ensure consistent positioning (prone placement on a polyethylene foam head holder allowing rotational movement), identical impact parameters (angle, depth, velocity, and duration), and standardized peri- and post-procedural conditions, including medetomidine antagonization with atipamazole (0.5 mg/kg, s.c.), re-induction of anesthesia (4% isoflurane in O₂ 30%/N₂O 70%), and temperature control at 37 ± 1.0 °C, across repeated sessions to maintain reproducibility across animals and time points.
  6. Ensure consistent positioning, impact parameters, and recovery conditions across repeated sessions to maintain reproducibility across animals and time points.
  7. Monitor animals continuously for cumulative behavioral deficits following repeated impacts.

8. Kinematic analysis

  1. Export the videos in standard format (e.g., MP4) for analysis and load them into Kinovea software.
  2. Navigate to the relevant time window containing pre- and post-impact frames (e.g., -0.025 to 0.3 s from impact). Make sure to set an adequate frame rate (e.g., 240 fps) in the software settings. Define a scaling reference (e.g., inter-eye distance).
  3. Use Kinovea’s tracking tool to establish a three-point tracking setup (e.g., right eye, left eye, nose; Figure 3A). Start tracking for each point and manually correct tracking errors, particularly during rapid motion or occlusion.
  4. Export tracked coordinates as CSV or Excel files.
    NOTE: Further kinematic analysis was performed using a custom MATLAB script. Time-resolved tracking data exported from Kinovea were imported and preprocessed to remove invalid entries and ensure consistent time scaling. Head translation was defined as the centroid of the three tracked landmarks (right eye, left eye, and nose), from which linear displacement, velocity, and acceleration were derived using numerical differentiation. Head rotation was estimated from the orientation of the eye–nose axis, with angular displacement calculated relative to a pre-impact baseline and angular velocity obtained as its first derivative. To reduce noise amplification, all position and angular signals were smoothed using a Savitzky–Golay filter prior to differentiation. The primary outcome parameter was the maximum angular displacement, while velocity and acceleration profiles were analyzed as relative measures of head motion dynamics across trials.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

General considerations:

Application of this protocol reproducibly induces concussive brain injury, as demonstrated by a defined set of structural, behavioral, and neurovascular validation readouts (see Figure 2). Structural integrity was preserved following injury. No overt macroscopic tissue disruption or hemorrhage was detected, indicating that the protocol induces concussive rather than contusive brain injury. Histological assessment confirmed...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

A novel mouse model of closed-head CBI based on acceleration-deceleration injury is characterized, featuring a mild yet widespread impairment of the BBB and a distinct neuropsychiatric phenotype reminiscent of clinical concussion. By reproducing key hallmarks of CBI in a controlled and consistent manner while preserving structural integrity, the model provides a useful and well-characterized experimental framework for studying the mechanisms underlying CBI and its neuropsychiatric and cognitive sequelae.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

AI-assisted tools were used for minor language editing and wording suggestions. All scientific content and conclusions were developed by the authors.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; German Research Foundation): Project-ID 431549029 – SFB 1451. S.D. received a stipend from the Gerok-Program (Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Medication
AntipamezoleVetoquinolVM 06043/4004Medetomidine antagonist (α2-adrenoceptor antagonist), subcutaneous (0.5 mg/kg)
Bepanthen Ophthalmic OintmentBayer 11809917Eye protection during anesthesia, topical 
BupivacaineSigma-AldrichB1160000Local anesthesia, subcutaneous (0.1 mg/kg)
IsofluraneCP pharma1214CNAnesthesia, inhalation (induction and maintenance)
MedotomidineVetoquinolVM 06043/4003Sedative/anesthetic adjunct (α2-adrenoceptor agonist), subcutaneously (0.5 mg/kg)
Tramadol hydrochloride (100 mg/mL)Grünenthal6867645Analgesic administered via drinking water, 1 mg/mL final concentration for mice, from 2 days pre- to 3 days post-surgery
Equipment
Polyethylene neck cusionCustomSupport for prone positioning during impact
Sterotaxic Impactor Silupran Cover CustomDistributes mechanical load, prevents focal skull damage, attached to impactor tip, 830 kPa
Streotaxic ImpactorLeica Biosystems39463923/IM10131Electromagnetic impact device for controlled impact delivery
Tools
GoPro Hero6GoPro Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA
Kinovea (version 2025.2.0)
MATLABMathWorks, Natick, MA, USANA

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

NeuroscienceAlltraumatic brain injuryConcussionCBITBIRodent Model

Related Articles