A new surgical technique was developed for implanting telemetry devices in pigs that allows continuous monitoring without discomfort. The device is placed on the back, minimizing irritation and infection risk.
Method Article
A new surgical technique was developed for implanting telemetry devices in pigs that allows continuous monitoring without discomfort. The device is placed on the back, minimizing irritation and infection risk.
Telemetry devices are essential for preclinical cardiovascular research, allowing for continuous monitoring of physiological parameters like electrocardiogram, temperature, and respiration in experimental animals without causing disruption. Traditional methods, such as intra-abdominal placement, can cause discomfort, particularly in pigs due to their habit of lying prone. To address this issue, a novel surgical technique was developed for implanting wireless telemetry devices in pigs, aimed at improving animal comfort and maintaining signal quality. This study involved 40 Yorkshire pigs (20-30 kg). The telemetry device was implanted in the back. A 2 inch incision was made lateral to the spine, followed by blunt dissection to create a pocket under the latissimus dorsi fascia. The pocket was treated with a vancomycin solution to prevent infection before device insertion. The leads were secured, and the site was closed in layers. All pigs showed strong, continuous telemetry signals after surgery. Over the 180-day follow-up period, only two cases of infection occurred: One was managed with antibiotics, and the other required device removal. No significant bleeding or loss of telemetry signal was observed, and all animals survived to the end of the study. This new technique offers a reliable method for implanting telemetry devices in pigs, reducing discomfort and infection risk while providing high-quality physiological data. It holds promise for broader use in preclinical cardiovascular research, improving both animal welfare and data reliability.
Telemetry devices play a pivotal role in advancing the understanding of cardiovascular physiology, particularly in studies using an animal model of myocardial infarction. By enabling the continuous monitoring of physiological signals, including vital parameters and electrocardiogram (ECG) readings, these devices offer invaluable insights into the dynamic changes occurring during cardiac events. In preclinical studies, where animal models like pigs are instrumental in mimicking human cardiovascular responses, telemetry devices have become indispensable tools1. The ability to record ECG continuously in unrestrained, freely moving animals provides a nuanced perspective on the impact of myocardial infarction, allowing researchers to capture real-time alterations in cardiac function.
In studies involving animal models of myocardial infarction, implantable telemetry devices offer distinct advantages. They facilitate the measurement of critical parameters such as heart rate with minimal disruption to the animals' natural behavior, eliminating potential confounding factors introduced by external devices2.
These devices often come with a manual with instructions for their surgical implantation, but different studies and animal models may require implantation techniques different from those in the manual. Traditional telemetry implantation sites, such as intra-abdominal or neck placement, present drawbacks in porcine models used in extended cardiovascular studies, including potential discomfort, interference with femoral access, restricted movement, and increased infection risk1,2,3. Therefore, an alternative approach was needed that was compatible with long-term monitoring in unrestrained pigs.
Compared to traditional intra-abdominal placement, which can cause discomfort, or neck placement, which has had lower success rates in pigs in some other studies, this dorsal approach aims to improve welfare while maintaining data quality.
The primary goal of this study was to develop and validate a novel surgical technique for implanting wireless telemetry devices in the backs of pigs to ensure animal comfort and reliability. The aim was to harness the benefits of continuous ECG monitoring over an extended period (up to 180 days). This technique was developed in response to the limitations observed with traditional implantation methods (e.g., intra-abdominal, inguinal, and neck placements), which in pigs are associated with substantial risk of discomfort, limited mobility, interference with vascular access, and infection. We developed this novel dorsal approach to enhance animal welfare, reduce postoperative complications, and maintain reliable signal quality during long-term monitoring in unrestrained animals.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
All animal procedures were approved by The Texas Heart Institute's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Animals were implanted with the EMKA easyTEL+L-EEEETA digital system (https://www.emkatech.com/product/easytel-large-animals/).
1. Preoperative preparations for experimental animals
2. Sedation and anesthesia
3. Surgical procedure
4. Post -operative care
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The data presented in Table 1 show the reliability and safety of the surgical technique for dorsal implantation of telemetry devices in pigs. Successful ECG transmission was recorded in all 40 pigs (100%), confirming that the positioning of the device and lead configuration consistently enabled effective long-term signal acquisition. The absence of major bleeding events (0%; defined as ≥10 mL of blood loss) indicates the safety of the fascial pocket dissection and careful handling of vascular structures....
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
A device-implantation procedure is described as a new invasive telemetric method of continuous ECG monitoring. This method ensures reliable recordings in animal experiments. Although the user manual for the EMKA device4 describes a surgical procedure for implanting the device in the abdomen of large animals such as dogs and pigs, intra-abdominal placement was not considered desirable because pigs typically lie on their abdomen, resulting in pressure on the peritoneum that could cause pain or disco...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
None declared.
Stephen N. Palmer, PhD, ELS, of the Department of Scientific Publications at The Texas Heart Institute, contributed to the editing of the manuscript.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 cc syringe | Vetone | V1 670097 | |
| 10 cc syringe | Medline | SYR110010 | |
| 12 cc syringe | Vetone | V1 670065 | |
| 20 cc syringe | Nipro | JD+20L | |
| 20G needle | Medline | SYR100205 | |
| 3 cc syringe | Nipro | JD+03L-NIJ | |
| ACT cartridge | Medtronic | 402-03 | |
| Alcohol | Vetone | V1 500205 | |
| Anesthesia circuit | Fisher & Paykel | RT210 | |
| Angiocath 14 Fr | BD | 382269 | |
| Atropine sulfate | Vetone | V1 510221 | |
| Bariatric drape | Medline | DYNJP3105 | |
| Blade 10 | Medline | MDS15010 | |
| Blade 11 | Medline | MDS15011 | |
| Buprenorphine | PAR Pharmaceuticals | 3003408B | |
| Camera cover | Aspen Surgical | LT-C02 | |
| Cautery pen | Medline | ESPB3000 | |
| Cautery pen scratch pad | Medline | DYNJ01208 | |
| Coflex 2" tape | Vetwrap | 1404BK | |
| Curos cap protector | 3M | CFF1-270 | |
| ECG electrodes | Medline | MDSM618305 | |
| EMKA easyTEL+L-EEEETA digital system | EMKA | ||
| Endotracheal tube | Jorvet | J0615J | |
| Flunixin meglumine | Merck | 65707 | |
| Injection cap | ICU Medical | C1000 | |
| Introducer catheter 5F | Abbott | 406101 | |
| Introducer catheter 6F | Abbott | 407845 | |
| Isoflurane | Vetone | MWI502017 | |
| IV Catheter Extension Set | Baxter | 2C8612 | |
| IV Pump Set SmartSite | BD Alaris | 2420-0007 | |
| Light cover | Medline | DYNJLHS2 | |
| Naxcel (ceftiofur) | Zoetis | 25434 | |
| Needle counter | Medline | DYNJNC20F | |
| Percutaneous entry needle | Cook | G00272 | |
| Permahand silk 2-0 | Ethicon | C012D | |
| PlasmaLyte | Baxter | 2B2544 | |
| Povidone-iodine paint sticks | Aplicare | ORF20025S | |
| Pressure monitoring transducer 1x1 | Edwards Lifesciences | PX260 | |
| Pressure tubing 84" | Edwards Lifesciences | 50P184 | |
| Saline | Baxter | 2F7124 | |
| Shoe covers | Medline | NON29858 | |
| Skin stapler | Covidien | 8886803712 | |
| Specimen cup | Medline | DYND30389 | |
| Sponge, 4"×4", X-ray detectable | Covidien | 441002 | |
| Sponge, lap | Medline | MDS241518 | |
| Surgeon's cap | CardinalHealth | 4359 | |
| Surgical gloves | Medline | MSG9065 | |
| Surgical gowns | Medline | DYNJP2001S | |
| Surgical mask | Halyard | 6211580 | |
| Table cover | Medline | DYNJP2311 | |
| Telazol | Zoetis | 10004135 | |
| Tissue adhesive | 3M | 1469SB | |
| Vancomycin | Fresenius Kabi | 402254G | |
| Vicryl 1 | Ethicon | J480H | |
| Vicryl 2-0 | Ethicon | J869H |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request Permission