$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Formal institutional approval was obtained from the institutional Medical Ethics Committee before the initiation of the retrospective review. The investigation was conducted in strict accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. For the retrospective study design utilizing de-identified historical data, a waiver of informed consent was obtained from the oversight committee. Broad general consent for research utilization had been secured from patients at the time of their initial surgical admission.
1. Patient selection and cohort stratification
Case screening and group assignment
The institutional electronic medical record database was screened to identify all patients diagnosed with primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) who had undergone phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and goniosynechialysis (PEI-GSL) during the defined study period.
Establishment of the Malignant Glaucoma (MG) group
Records of patients who developed postoperative malignant glaucoma (MG) within three months following the primary surgery were extracted. Strict diagnostic criteria were applied, including persistent shallowing or complete flattening of both the central and peripheral anterior chamber, accompanied by normal or elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), in the presence of a patent peripheral iridotomy. The diagnosis was independently confirmed by two senior glaucoma specialists who were masked to subsequent volumetric analyses.
Establishment of the control group
A random sampling sequence (e.g., generated using a computer-generated random number table) was implemented to select control participants from the remaining pool of patients who had undergone identical PEI-GSL surgery during the same time frame by the same surgeon but did not exhibit signs of postoperative aqueous misdirection.
Eligibility and exclusion screening
Strict exclusion criteria were applied to all candidate records to minimize potential confounding factors. Excluded records included those with: (1) incomplete demographic, clinical, or imaging datasets; (2) a history of prior intraocular surgery or laser interventions; (3) intraoperative complications, including expulsive suprachoroidal hemorrhage, posterior capsular rupture, or intraoperative choroidal detachment; (4) secondary glaucoma configurations, such as neovascular, traumatic, uveitic, or exfoliative glaucoma, or primary open-angle glaucoma; and (5) coexisting structural anomalies, specifically nanophthalmos (defined as an axial length <20.0 mm) or lens subluxation.
2. Clinical baseline and preoperative examination procedures
Routine biometric assessment
Upon admission, standardized comprehensive ocular examinations were performed. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was documented using standard charts, and baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured via Goldmann applanation tonometry. Detailed slit-lamp biomicroscopy was performed to verify anterior chamber depth and iris configuration. Optical biometry was conducted using an automated optical biometer to measure pre-surgical axial length (AL) via partial coherence interferometry.
Preoperative gonioscopy mapping
Dynamic and static gonioscopy were performed in a darkened room using a four-mirror gonioprism under minimal corneal pressure. The static narrow-angle configuration was documented according to the Scheie classification (Grades I–IV). To quantify peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS), gentle posterior pressure (compression gonioscopy) was applied to force open the recess, and the strict clock-hour extent of irreversible organic synechial angle closure across 360° was recorded.
Posterior segment screening
Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) scanning of the macula and optic disc was performed as part of the routine clinical protocol to assess the structural integrity of the retinal nerve fiber layer and to rule out comorbid vitreoretinal or macular pathologies. OCT-derived variables were excluded from subsequent predictive models of anterior segment crowding to maintain focus on local structural risk markers. Standard preoperative topical antimicrobial and fast-acting pressure-lowering medications were administered as clinically indicated.
3. Standardized surgical orchestration (PEI-GSL)
Anesthesia and incision architecture
Topical anesthesia was administered using topical ophthalmic anesthetic eye drops (0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride) three times before the procedure. The surgical field was sterilized and draped according to sterile ophthalmic protocols. A 2.2 mm main clear corneal tunnel incision was created at the temporal limbus, and a 1.0 mm side-port incision was created approximately 90° away using calibrated ophthalmic surgical blades.
Viscoelastic manipulation and goniosynechialysis
The anterior chamber was filled with a cohesive ophthalmic viscoelastic agent to deepen the space and maintain structural stability. A goniosynechialysis spatula was inserted through the side port under direct visualization through a surgical goniolens. The peripheral iris tissue was gently displaced posteriorly away from the trabecular meshwork. Mechanical dissection was performed across all clock hours exhibiting peripheral anterior synechiae until the scleral spur and trabecular meshwork were fully exposed.
Cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation
A continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis approximately 5.0–5.5 mm in diameter was created. When pupil dilation was insufficient because of chronic synechiae, temporary pupil expansion devices were used to improve visualization. Standard phacoemulsification of the crystalline lens nucleus was performed using low-energy ultrasound parameters, followed by automated bimanual irrigation and aspiration of residual cortical material. A cohesive ophthalmic viscoelastic agent was injected to expand the capsular bag, and a foldable hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens was implanted into the capsular bag. Residual viscoelastic material was then thoroughly aspirated from the anterior chamber and the retro-lens space.
Wound closure and postoperative medication management
The corneal stromal edges of the incisions were hydrated with balanced isotonic ophthalmic irrigation solution to achieve self-sealing wound closure. Structural watertight integrity was verified using the Seidel leakage test. At the conclusion of surgery, a combined antibiotic–corticosteroid ophthalmic ointment was applied. A standardized one-month postoperative topical regimen was maintained, consisting of combined antibiotic–corticosteroid ophthalmic drops (four times daily, tapered weekly), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory ophthalmic drops (twice daily), and miotic ophthalmic drops containing 0.5% pilocarpine (twice daily) to stabilize the iris–lens diaphragm configuration.
4. Ultrasound biomicroscopy image acquisition settings
Instrument calibration and settings
High-frequency digital ultrasound biomicroscopy imaging was performed using a 50 MHz ultrasound biomicroscopy transducer. The electronic gain was set to 60–75 dB, with a scanning field of view of 14.0 mm × 10 mm and a scanning depth resolution of ≤50 µm. Prior to imaging, system calibration was verified using the manufacturer's automated electronic standard.
Scan execution and quality control checkpoints
Patients were positioned comfortably in the supine position under standardized mesopic lighting conditions (<5 lux). Patients were instructed to maintain steady fixation on a ceiling-mounted target. A sterile ophthalmic immersion eye cup was inserted into the conjunctival sac and filled with sterile physiological saline or 1% methylcellulose as an acoustic coupling medium. The high-frequency ultrasound probe was then gently immersed without applying mechanical pressure to the cornea.
Horizontal panoramic scan workflow
The probe was aligned horizontally across the vertical visual axis to obtain a panoramic cross-sectional image passing through the geometric center of the pupil. Image quality was considered acceptable only when the scleral spurs, iris contour, and anterior lens capsule were simultaneously and symmetrically visible on both the nasal and temporal sides of the image.
Radial quadrant scan workflow
Radial line scans were acquired at the 12, 3, 6, and 9 o'clock positions of the corneal limbus, corresponding to the superior, nasal, inferior, and temporal quadrants. At each location, the probe angle was adjusted until optimal acoustic alignment was achieved, as indicated by a distinct hyper-reflective scleral spur and clear visualization of the ciliary process apices. Images that did not meet these quality criteria were discarded and re-acquired.
5. Software-specific image measurement workflow
Image standardization and blinded randomization
Raw, uncompressed digital ultrasound biomicroscopy images were exported from the imaging system. To minimize assessor bias, all exported files were processed using an automated script that removed patient identifiers, randomized the image display order, and assigned a unique computer-generated cryptographic hash to each image. The randomized and blinded image set was subsequently provided to a single experienced glaucoma specialist for quantitative analysis.
Scale calibration and workspace setup
Images were opened in ImageJ. Spatial calibration was performed using the manufacturer's embedded calibration scale bar. A line corresponding to the known scale-bar length was defined, and the known distance and measurement unit (mm) were entered into the calibration settings. The calibration was applied globally to all images. Image contrast and brightness were standardized using fixed display settings to optimize visualization of anatomical boundaries.
Structural metric extraction and landmark resolution
Manual measurements were performed following predefined anatomical criteria.
Anterior Chamber Depth (ACD)
Anterior chamber depth was measured as the perpendicular distance between the central corneal endothelium and the anterior lens surface.
Lens Vault (LV)
A line connecting the nasal and temporal scleral spurs was established as the reference baseline. Lens vault was measured as the perpendicular distance from the anterior pole of the crystalline lens to the spur-to-spur baseline.
Ciliary Process–Ciliary Process Distance (CCD)
Using panoramic scans, the distance between the innermost ciliary process apex on one side and the corresponding apex on the opposite side was measured.
Ciliary body thickness boundary architecture
Radial quadrant scans were evaluated to identify the scleral spur and ciliary body boundaries. In regions affected by acoustic shadowing, measurements were referenced to the interface between the hyporeflective ciliary muscle tissue and the hyperreflective inner scleral wall.
Ciliary body thickness parameters
CBT0 was defined as the perpendicular distance from the scleral spur to the inner uveal border. CBT1000 was measured at a location 1000 µm posterior to the scleral spur along the inner scleral wall, with thickness determined perpendicular to the scleral surface. CBTmax was defined as the maximum thickness of the ciliary body adjacent to the ciliary process apex, measured perpendicular to the outer scleral surface.
Anterior Placement of the Ciliary Body (APCB)
A reference line perpendicular to the inner scleral wall was established at the scleral spur. APCB was measured as the perpendicular distance from the most anterior ciliary process apex to this reference line.
Trabecular–Ciliary Process Angle (TCPA)
The scleral spur served as the vertex of the angle. One arm extended along the inner border of the trabecular meshwork, while the second arm extended along the anterior surface of the ciliary process. The resulting angle was recorded in degrees.
Simulated Cilio-Lenticular Distance (sCLD)
A virtual tangent line passing through the scleral spur and oriented parallel to the outer scleral surface was established. The shortest distance from the ciliary process apex to this tangent line and the shortest distance from the anterior lens capsule to the same tangent line were measured. The difference between these measurements was recorded, with negative values retained when the ciliary process extended anteriorly beyond the lens plane.
For parameters obtained from quadrant-based measurements, values from the superior, nasal, inferior, and temporal quadrants were averaged to generate a single anatomical index for each eye.
6. Reproducible statistical analysis workflow
Package deployment and environment initialization
All computational and statistical analyses were performed in the R environment (version 4.5.1). The analytical workflow incorporated the tidyverse suite, including the ggplot2 package for data visualization, the stats package for statistical modeling, and the factoextra package for principal component analysis visualization. A significance level of α = 0.05 was adopted for all statistical tests.
Univariate and covariate adjustment analysis
Data distributions were assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Variables exhibiting normal distributions were compared using independent two-sample t-tests assuming equal variances, whereas non-normally distributed variables were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test.
Multiple testing correction
To account for multiple simultaneous ultrasound biomicroscopy parameter comparisons, p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate procedure. Adjusted q-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Standardized mean differences
Standardized mean differences were calculated to assess group balance.
Multivariable logistic regression
Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to identify independent predictors while controlling for potential confounding variables. Axial length was included as a covariate, and Wald statistics were used to evaluate predictor significance.
Multivariate coordination and pattern clustering
Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess relationships among key biometric parameters. Correlation coefficients were subsequently transformed using Fisher’s z-transformation to evaluate differences in inter-parameter coordination between study groups.
Principal component analysis
Quantitative variables were standardized using the Z-score transformation prior to analysis. Principal component analysis was performed to characterize multivariate structural patterns and evaluate group separation. Variable loadings and participant projections were extracted and visualized using principal component analysis visualization tools.
Composite scoring framework
An unweighted composite ciliary block score was calculated using standardized values of simulated cilio-lenticular distance, trabecular–ciliary process angle, and lens vault. The directionality of simulated cilio-lenticular distance and trabecular–ciliary process angle was reversed such that higher values consistently reflected increased anatomical risk. The composite score was obtained by summing the aligned standardized metrics for each participant.